State v. Shugart

1

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

No. 115,158

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

STATE OF KANSAS,
Appellee,

v.

DARRIUS SHUGART,
Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; DEBORAH HERNANDEZ MITCHELL, judge. Opinion filed
September 30, 2016. Affirmed.

Submitted for summary disposition pursuant to K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 21-6820(g) and (h).

Before GREEN, P.J., MCANANY and STANDRIDGE, JJ.

Per Curiam: In this appeal we granted Darrius Shugart's motion for summary
disposition in lieu of briefs pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7.041A (2015 Kan. Ct. R.
Annot. 67).

Shugart was convicted of two counts of kidnapping, six counts of criminal
possession of a firearm, four counts of aggravated assault, two counts of aggravated
burglary, two counts of attempted aggravated robbery, plus aggravated robbery, criminal
threat, theft, criminal discharge of a firearm, and criminal damage to property. The
district court sentenced Shugart to 184 months' imprisonment. On appeal, this court
remanded the case with instructions to vacate the five convictions for criminal possession
of a firearm because they were multiplicitous. We affirmed Shugart's other convictions
2

and sentences. State v. Shugart, No. 109,795, 2014 WL 6909542, at *1 (Kan. App. 2014)
(unpublished opinion), rev. denied 302 Kan. 1020 (2015).

At the remand hearing, Shugart asked the district court to impose a lesser sentence
on the nonvacated convictions. The district court vacated the five criminal possession of a
firearm counts but declined Shugart's request to otherwise modify his sentence. Shugart
argues the district court erred in denying his requested sentence modification.

Under the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act, "authority to modify does not exist
in a multiple-conviction case unless the conviction for the primary crime is reversed."
State v. Morningstar, 299 Kan. 1236, 1243, 329 P.3d 1093 (2014) (citing State v. Guder,
293 Kan. 763, 766, 267 P.3d 751 [2012]). Here, we only reversed nonprimary crimes—
five counts of criminal possession of a firearm. Thus, the district court lacked authority to
resentence Shugart on his other convictions and did not err in declining to do so.

Shugart also contends the district court violated his constitutional rights under
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000), by
using his prior juvenile adjudications to increase his sentence without proving them to a
jury beyond a reasonable doubt. This issue was raised and rejected in Shugart's direct
appeal. Our decision on this issue in Shugart's direct appeal is consistent with the
decision in State v. Hitt, 273 Kan. 224, 236, 42 P.3d 732 (2002), cert. denied 537 U.S.
1104 (2003). We are duty bound to follow the holding in Hitt, there being no indication
that the Supreme Court is departing from Hitt. See State v. Harris, 293 Kan. 798, 818,
269 P.3d 820 (2012).

Affirmed.